On September 28, 2011 I spent the
day at AUM. I attended a meeting between
the Information Services group and faculty from the School of Liberal
Arts. The meeting was called to
brainstorm the potential use or viability of iPads within several undergraduate
classes in the English department. The
faculty wanted to use the iPads to encourage more effective communication
literacy skills, offer better research opportunities, and greater visual appeal
in learning for face to face classes. Hardware,
software, and security program costs were discussed, as well as, the pros and
cons of the iPads in relation to how faculty planned to use the technology
within the classroom.
It was determined fairly quickly
that Netbooks are more viable, because they actually possess a processor, more
memory, and a raised keyboard for easier typing. The Liberal Arts faculty proposed to use the
equipment on a check in/out basis and made the decision to go ahead with the
purchase. They planned to test the
technology with a few pilot classes and
collect feedback through some type of online survey.
After the meeting, Sandra and I
discussed potential uses for the Netbooks in relation to collaboration between
students during face to face interaction.
We talked about many programs that might be utilized through the
technology. Students could use an online
meeting room; such as, Wimba, Yugma, Elluminate, or DimDim to share information
during group activity. Because of privacy
concerns, we agreed it might be best to utilize Blackboard tools; such as, Wimba
Classroom, Discussion Boards, Blogs, & Wikis to collaborate in class or
from home. Blackboard has elements that might be utilized
in any setting…face to face, hybrid, or online.
We also talked about the research
potential and motivational aspect for in-class use of the Netbook. We concurred that it would be a fun way to
add visual elements to the classroom experience. Many students would also enjoy the technology
because it would give them immediate access to information and would allow them
a greater ability to organize the information as opposed to the traditional
paper notebook. I completely agree. As someone who has (at times) had difficulty reading
her own scribbled notes…the Netbook might be an attractive alternative to paper
notebook chaos. On the other hand…people
speak on average 125-150 words per minute.
I am not aware of anyone that can type 125 to 150 words per minute…maybe
a court stenographer?
Many students have limited physical
mobility or lack typing skills to actually use a Netbook for taking in-class
notes. However, the Instructor could
very well give students the choice of how they want to take notes. This would certainly ease the stress level within
the class. Another recommendation I had
was to offer any pre-class training that would help a student feel more
comfortable with the equipment.
I found interesting information
related to the use of Netbooks in the learning environment at the following
link:
No comments:
Post a Comment